Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '24 at 10:04
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$816
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 410
54% 408 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$785
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.2% Poor
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 27.4
24% 30.6 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 29
Splatting 25.8
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 120GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 235
Mixed 330
76% 345 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 33.8
135% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 46.2
DQ Mixed 16.7
45% 103 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
SSD 120GB
7GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 227
Mixed 332
76% 344 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 33.6
136% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 180
158% 234 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 32.1
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 25.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 19.9" 1600 877 GSM5AC7 LG HD PLUS
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $2,959
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback